But would need to focus on getting Otech advantages, etc. Potential neg args to figure out: int’l development to ocean tech, ocean sovereignty and int’l law stuff (LOST), different alt energy CPs, Lopez, perhaps the ocean advantage without actually USING the energy, Mapping/surveillance link to K, Benefits so far: reasonable federal warrant, non-energy basis, utilities case, potential PIC to utilities affs that include Otech.
NAMES: Amanda, Stacy, Nahum, Alex Z.,
Natives:
Extend tax cuts. Advantage is about Native American sovereignty issues. Potential neg args: Give the land back CP, sovereignty impact turns, Paternalism/Gift, all representation ks (noble savage, etc), Benefits so far: reasonable federal warrant (states are real bad for native sovereignty), potential PIC to other affs,
NAMES: Regan, Jillian, Emma
Military:
Would need more research on what specific alt energy. Some alt energy for cars in the military. Wouldn’t need to specific energy source. Nano military, Potential neg args: privatization/ civilian CP, DARPA bad, env’t securization K, Benefits so far:
NAMES: Jeff, Bailey,
RPS/on utilities
Climate, competitiveness, etc. Potential neg args: states CP, Cap & Trade CP, Benefits so far:
NAMES: Ishita, Alex G, Sam
Nanotech:
Subsidize nanotech by arguing that increasing nanotech is an incentive. Potentially nano for solar. Potential neg args: PIC to do it out of military, Regulation CP, Grey Goo, Impossible, Benefits so far:
NAME: Risha, Neerajah
Transportation sector:
Café standards. Ideally it’s a positive motivation for alt energy and not a disincentive for fossil fuels. Potentially Hydrogen! Potential neg args: pretty expensive, Benefits so far: hydrogen economy adv to other affs
Name: Charlie, Taylor
Nuclear power:
Reprocessing tech or open it to the civilian market to develop it. Change the licensing process. Potential incentives about the wonder of nuke war. Reverse the act that prevents reprocessing – which may solve for the radiation issue. Subsidize the generation 4 power. Reprocessing makes an alt energy available in the US that did not exist before. Potential neg args: Safety/radiation issues, nuke prolif etc, Reprocessing may conflict with our Iran power, T alt energy incentive, Benefits so far:
NAME: Hao, Jen, Adi, Neha,
Foreign incentives?:
Potential neg args: relations da, free trade DA
NAME: Richie
Otech:
But would need to focus on getting Otech advantages, etc.Potential neg args to figure out: int’l development to ocean tech, ocean sovereignty and int’l law stuff (LOST), different alt energy CPs, Lopez, perhaps the ocean advantage without actually USING the energy, Mapping/surveillance link to K,
Benefits so far: reasonable federal warrant, non-energy basis, utilities case, potential PIC to utilities affs that include Otech.
NAMES: Amanda, Stacy, Nahum, Alex Z.,
Natives:
Extend tax cuts. Advantage is about Native American sovereignty issues.Potential neg args: Give the land back CP, sovereignty impact turns, Paternalism/Gift, all representation ks (noble savage, etc),
Benefits so far: reasonable federal warrant (states are real bad for native sovereignty), potential PIC to other affs,
NAMES: Regan, Jillian, Emma
Military:
Would need more research on what specific alt energy. Some alt energy for cars in the military. Wouldn’t need to specific energy source. Nano military,Potential neg args: privatization/ civilian CP, DARPA bad, env’t securization K,
Benefits so far:
NAMES: Jeff, Bailey,
RPS/on utilities
Climate, competitiveness, etc.Potential neg args: states CP, Cap & Trade CP,
Benefits so far:
NAMES: Ishita, Alex G, Sam
Nanotech:
Subsidize nanotech by arguing that increasing nanotech is an incentive. Potentially nano for solar.Potential neg args: PIC to do it out of military, Regulation CP, Grey Goo, Impossible,
Benefits so far:
NAME: Risha, Neerajah
Transportation sector:
Café standards. Ideally it’s a positive motivation for alt energy and not a disincentive for fossil fuels. Potentially Hydrogen!Potential neg args: pretty expensive,
Benefits so far: hydrogen economy adv to other affs
Name: Charlie, Taylor
Nuclear power:
Reprocessing tech or open it to the civilian market to develop it. Change the licensing process. Potential incentives about the wonder of nuke war. Reverse the act that prevents reprocessing – which may solve for the radiation issue. Subsidize the generation 4 power. Reprocessing makes an alt energy available in the US that did not exist before.Potential neg args: Safety/radiation issues, nuke prolif etc, Reprocessing may conflict with our Iran power, T alt energy incentive,
Benefits so far:
NAME: Hao, Jen, Adi, Neha,
Foreign incentives?:
Potential neg args: relations da, free trade DANAME: Richie